Blog uživatele zoenuttall2481073

Rep

Tuesday's conclusion by the prestigious Institute of Medicine was a blow to parents of autistic children who blame vaccination for the brain disorder and are pushing - http://www.search.com/search?q=pushing for more research of the issue.

But the Institute of Medicine's panel of prominent scientists pointed to five large studies, here and in Denmark, Sweden and Britain that tracked thousands of children since 2001 and found no association between autism and thimerosal.

While high doses of mercury can cause neurologic damage, there's no evidence that this type of damage causes the symptoms specific to autism -- and no laboratory or animal research that proves how the much smaller amounts in thimerosal could do so, either, the IOM concluded.

On the other hand, genetics plays a role in autism, and several studies show clear signs of prenatal onset of the disorder, including brain differences at birth, the report notes.

"Don't misunderstand: The committee members are fully aware that this is a very horrible and devastating condition," said Dr. Marie McCormick, a Harvard professor of maternal and child health who led the IOM probe. "It's important to get to the root of what's happening."

But, "there seem to be lots of opportunities for research that would be more productive" than continuing the vaccine hunt.

Autism is a complex developmental disorder best known for impairing a child's ability to communicate and interact with others. Recent data suggest a 10-fold increase in autism rates over the last decade, although it's not clear how much of the apparent surge reflects better diagnosis and how much is a true rise.

Thimerosal has been used as a pharmaceutical preservative since the 1930s. Although the amount of mercury it contains is very small, in 1999 public health officials ordered manufacturers to phase thimerosal out of common vaccines, from hepatitis to diphtheria, as a precaution, saying small infants had begun getting so many immunizations that they might get too much of the chemical. Today it's all but gone.

There is a notable exception -- flu shots. The CDC just added influenza to the list of shots for babies, and most flu shots still contain mercury.

Thimerosal critics, who had derived hope from a 2001 Institute of Medicine review that called the potential link unproven but medically plausible, were disappointed by Tuesday's reconsideration.

"The science is still out, the verdict is still out," said Lyn Redwood, president of the SafeMinds activist group and mother of an autistic son. "They've just set us back five years in terms of getting more science."

Some parents argue that children may be born genetically susceptible to autism and some environmental factor, such as thimerosal, 카지노사이트 - http://blog.printgila.com/ triggers it.

Jennifer Lassiter has a daughter with autism, reports CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. Katelyn, a bright 8-year-old, cannot connect with the world.

Lassiter said Katelyn was a happy normal, babbling baby until getting her shots when she was 15-months-old.

"She got her vaccinations, she ran a low grade fever," she told Attkisson. "She had a little rash and then she stopped talking."

Her parents didn't connect the dots until they needed her shot records for preschool. Her doctor had misplaced them, so just gave her another round.

Afterwards, "she was walking in circles, she was lining things up, screeching and flapping," Lassiter said.

U.S. Rep. Dave Weldon, R-Fla., is a doctor who has proposed a bill banning just about all mercury in vaccines.

"The safety of thimeresol, which was the mercury product in the vaccines, has not been demonstrated. And actually a lot of the press reporting on this issue has been inaccurate,'' said Weldon.

Katelyn's parents support vaccines but not the mercury -- with their daughter unable to have a normal life, they ask how can it be wrong to err on the side of caution?

In one influential case, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled in 1990 that a judge was wrong to have granted a hospital permission to force a pregnant cancer patient to undergo a Caesarean in an attempt to save the life of her child

Some women's advocates said the cases illustrate a newfound willingness by legal officials to interfere with women's choices about their pregnancies.

"My impression is that we have a political culture right now that falsely pits fetal rights against women's rights, and that you are seeing a kind of snowballing effect," said Lynn Paltrow, of the New York-based group Wilkes-Barre General Hospital wouldn't budge, so Marlowe checked herself out and went looking for a new doctor.

While she was on her search, Wilkes-Barre General's lawyers rushed to court to get legal guardianship of her unborn child, giving the hospital the ability to force Marlowe into surgery - http://www.hometalk.com/search/posts?filter=surgery if she returned.

Marlowe ended up at another hospital, where she had a quick, natural birth she described as "a piece of cake." She didn't know about the first hospital's action until her husband was told by a reporter.

"They don't know me from anything, and they're making decisions about my body?" she said. "It was terrifying."

Officials with Wilkes-Barre General did not return calls seeking comment.

Some groups representing doctors, including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, have said that physicians should refrain from doing procedures unwanted by pregnant woman, and that use of the courts to resolve conflicts is almost never warranted.

A spokesman for the American Hospital Association wasn't immediately sure whether the organization has ever taken a position on the issue.

In Salt Lake City, an acknowledged cocaine addict with a history of mental health problems resisted having the operation for about two weeks before acquiescing. One of the twins she was carrying died during the delay. The mother was charged with capital murder but ultimately pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of child endangerment and was sentenced to probation.

Last month, prosecutors in Pittsburgh charged an unlicensed midwife with involuntary manslaughter for failing to take a woman to the hospital when her baby began to be delivered feet-first. The child died two days later. The midwife said she had been trying to honor the mother's wishes to have the baby at home.

And in Rochester, New York, a judge in late March ordered a homeless woman who had lost custody of several neglected children not to get pregnant again without court approval.

Legal experts and medical ethicists said attempts to prosecute women for pregnancy choices, or force them to undergo certain procedures for the benefit of their children, 카지노사이트 - https://panthersgroupltd.com/ may be on shaky ground.

"There are 50 years of case law and bioethical writings that say that competent people can refuse care, and that includes pregnant women as well," said Art Caplan, chairman of medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

In one influential case, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled in 1990 that a judge was wrong to have granted a hospital permission to force a pregnant cancer patient to undergo a Caesarean in an attempt to save the life of her child. The mother and baby died within two days of the operation.

Doctors' opinions on forced care for pregnant mothers have changed, too.

A 2002 survey by researchers at the University of Chicago found only 4 percent of directors of maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs believed pregnant women should be required to undergo potentially lifesaving treatment for the sake of their fetuses, down from 47 percent in 1987.

Dr. Michael Grodin, director of Medical Ethics at the Boston University School of Medicine, said doctors should seek court intervention when a mother refuses care only if the patient is mentally ill.

"Women have a right to refuse treatment. Women have a right to control their bodies. It is a dangerous slope. What's next? If someone doesn't seek prenatal care, what are we going to do, lock them up?"

By David B. Caruso

A spokesman for the American Hospital Association wasn't immediately sure whether the organization has ever taken a position on the issue

Some women's advocates said the cases illustrate a newfound willingness by legal officials to interfere with women's choices about their pregnancies.

"My impression is that we have a political culture right now that falsely pits fetal rights against women's rights, and that you are seeing a kind of snowballing effect," said Lynn Paltrow, of the New York-based group Wilkes-Barre General Hospital wouldn't budge, so Marlowe checked herself out and went looking for a new doctor.

While she was on her search, Wilkes-Barre General's lawyers rushed to court to get legal guardianship of her unborn child, giving the hospital the ability to force Marlowe into surgery if she returned.

Marlowe ended up at another hospital, where she had a quick, 카지노사이트 - http://www.motherbabe.com/ natural birth she described as "a piece of cake." She didn't know about the first hospital's action until her husband was told by a reporter.

"They don't know me from anything, and they're making decisions about my body?" she said. "It was terrifying."

Officials with Wilkes-Barre General did not return calls seeking comment.

Some groups representing doctors, including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, have said that physicians should refrain from doing procedures unwanted by pregnant woman, and that use of the courts to resolve conflicts is almost never warranted.

A spokesman for the American Hospital Association wasn't immediately sure whether the organization has ever taken a position on the issue.

In Salt Lake City, an acknowledged cocaine addict with a history of mental health problems resisted having the operation for about two weeks before acquiescing. One of the twins she was carrying died during the delay. The mother was charged with capital murder but ultimately pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of child endangerment and was sentenced - http://www.channel4.com/news/sentenced to probation.

Last month, prosecutors in Pittsburgh charged an unlicensed midwife with involuntary manslaughter for failing to take a woman to the hospital when her baby began to be delivered feet-first. The child died two days later. The midwife said she had been trying to honor the mother's wishes to have the baby at home.

And in Rochester, New York, a judge in late March ordered a homeless woman who had lost custody of several neglected children not to get pregnant again without court approval.

Legal experts and medical ethicists said attempts to prosecute women - http://www.covnews.com/archives/search/?searchthis=prosecute%20women for pregnancy choices, or force them to undergo certain procedures for the benefit of their children, may be on shaky ground.

"There are 50 years of case law and bioethical writings that say that competent people can refuse care, and that includes pregnant women as well," said Art Caplan, chairman of medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

In one influential case, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled in 1990 that a judge was wrong to have granted a hospital permission to force a pregnant cancer patient to undergo a Caesarean in an attempt to save the life of her child. The mother and baby died within two days of the operation.

Doctors' opinions on forced care for pregnant mothers have changed, too.

A 2002 survey by researchers at the University of Chicago found only 4 percent of directors of maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs believed pregnant women should be required to undergo potentially lifesaving treatment for the sake of their fetuses, down from 47 percent in 1987.

Dr. Michael Grodin, director of Medical Ethics at the Boston University School of Medicine, said doctors should seek court intervention when a mother refuses care only if the patient is mentally ill.

"Women have a right to refuse treatment. Women have a right to control their bodies. It is a dangerous slope. What's next? If someone doesn't seek prenatal care, what are we going to do, lock them up?"

By David B. Caruso

citizens

Peter Wyckoff, executive director of the Minnesota Senior Federation's metropolitan region office, said the lawsuit — which the organization hopes will be awarded class-action status — represents - https://www.gov.uk/search?q=represents a new phase in the group's efforts to make it easier to import drugs at lower Canadian prices.

"We have three branches of government that can change things," he said. "This is the third."

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis alleges Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals have acted in concert to block the supply of name-brand 카지노사이트 - http://achilles.com.vn/ drugs to Canadian pharmacists that sell to U.S. citizens.

GlaxoSmithKline spokeswoman Nancy Pekarek said the company acted independently - http://www.community.covnews.com/archives/search/?searchthis=acted%20ind... of the other companies, in an effort to preserve supplies of its medicines in Canada for that country.

In a statement, Pfizer said its practices comply with U.S. law and federal regulations.

"The simple truth is that the importation of pharmaceutical products into the U.S. from Canada is not only illegal, but also dangerous because it increases the opportunity to introduce counterfeit or unapproved pharmaceutical products into the market," said the statement from spokesman Bryant Haskins.

Representatives for the remaining companies either did not immediately respond to calls for comment or said they could not respond because they had not yet seen the lawsuit.

Merck spokeswoman Anita Larsen declined to comment on the suit, but said Merck "has not announced any plans to restrict or otherwise limit the availability of our medicines in Canada."

It was brought on behalf of the federation, which runs a program that helps its members to import from Canadian pharmacies, as well as three individual members who buy brand name drugs in the U.S. and "all others similarly situated."

"I think they're harmed because they have to pay a higher price here," said attorney Marvin Miller of the Chicago-based firm Miller Faucher and Cafferty, which is handling the case.

The lawsuit seeks attorneys' fees, unspecified damages and a stop to the companies' anti-import efforts. It's premised on federal antitrust laws as well as specific state consumer protection laws.

Last month, the federation held a "Pfix Pfizer" campaign that, besides the lawsuit, included congressional action, resolutions at Pfizer's stockholders meeting, and a boycott of Pfizer's over-the-counter products.

Alzheimer's developed in 151 participants, including 31 who had diabetes

The participants - http://www.martindale.com/Results.aspx?ft=2&frm=freesearch&lfd=Y&afs=par... in the study were 55 and older when the research began and were followed for an average of about six years. Alzheimer's developed in 151 participants, including 31 who had diabetes.

The researchers calculated that diabetics faced a 65 percent increased risk of developing the mind-robbing disease.

The link remained strong even when the researchers factored in the prevalence of strokes, which are a common complication of diabetes and are also believed to raise the risk of Alzheimer's.

Previous research has linked diabetes with memory problems, and diabetes is known to damage blood vessels that supply the brain. But studies looking specifically at diabetes and Alzheimer's have had conflicting results.

"This is one of the first long-term studies to follow people who start out with no evidence of Alzheimer's disease and track how having diabetes affects their risk of developing it," said William Thies, vice president for 카지노사이트 - https://www.bfassociados.com.br/ medical and scientific affairs at the Alzheimer's Association. "It's a powerful argument for doing everything you can to control your blood sugar."

Type 2 diabetes, the most common type of diabetes in older people, can often be controlled and even cured with exercise and diet.

Dr. George King of the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston called the research "quite important in light of the fact that diabetes is exploding," with some 18 million Americans affected and the numbers expected to double by 2050.

He said if the link is real, there could be a corresponding surge in Alzheimer's cases.

The study was led by Drs. Zoe Arvanitakis and David Bennett and colleagues at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago. It was published Monday in the May issue of Archives of Neurology.

The next step for researchers is to find out exactly how diabetes might lead to Alzheimer's.

Some scientists have theorized that diabetes might cause an overabundance of glucose in the brain, which could damage brain cells.

One recent mouse study involving Joslin researchers suggests that insulin abnormalities in diabetes might affect a protein called tau, which in Alzheimer's forms tangles in brain cells.

They say they were dropped after missing a recent payment

He's starting to lose his balance - http://www.thefreedictionary.com/balance and peripheral vision. The 50-year-old has very little short-term memory, and the formerly glib salesman now struggles to remember and pronounce words like "raspberry" in simple conversation. And the headaches are so severe, he doesn't want to get out of bed.

It's because the left side — and only the left side — of his brain is shrinking, and has been for about 10 years.

"Every once in awhile, I realize, 'Gee, I can't do that anymore,"' Mitchell said.

Doctors - http://www.groundreport.com/?s=Doctors do not have a clue why this is happening, and say normally suspect causes — like multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer's disease — are not at play here because they would equally shrink both sides of the brain.

But in Mitchell's case, the left side of his brain is 10 percent smaller than the right.

"That's very, very uncommon," Dr. Juan Troncoso, associate professor of pathology and neurology at Baltimore's Johns Hopkins University, said of Mitchell's condition. "There are cases described of degenerative diseases that are dominant on one side of the brain. But then, over 10 years of progression, you'd expect the other side to have some kind of abnormality."

Mitchell is scheduled to have a brain biopsy at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., later this month, a procedure that could be fatal.

Even though there is no guarantee it will uncover the cause of his shrinking brain, both Mitchell and his wife, Cynthia, said he has to try.

"I just don't want to sit there and not do anything," he says.

Mitchell's rare case has been featured at medical symposiums, but still hasn't produced a diagnosis.

He's seen about 15 neurologists, who have performed a battery of tests but found no answers.

"It was puzzling to the physicians," said Dr. Patrice Duvernay, a neurologist for Intermountain Health Care in Salt Lake City who has treated Mitchell.

Duvernay said the left side of his brain will continue to slowly shrink until doctors find a solution.

The shrinkage is only visible by looking at an MRI or CT scan, but what's going on inside his skull has taken a big toll on Mitchell's quality of life.

He can watch a movie a hundred times and still not remember how it ends.

His wife can tell him to be ready in a half an hour to visit a friend's house, and within 15 minutes he will have no idea why she's disappointed that he's not dressed.

The condition has completely changed Mitchell's personality. He now sleeps 12-14 hours a day, and said before he never slept more than six.

Sleeping and staying in bed about two days a week, he says, is one of the only ways to escape the constant headaches. A cabinet full of pain medication doesn't help.

Cynthia has seen her husband transform from a runner and hiker to a shy shut-in.

"It's hard, because David used to be such a vibrant extrovert," said Cynthia, who knows when her husband is having a bad day because there is a bulging vein in his forehead.

Mitchell also no longer enjoys socializing, because it frustrates him to probe for words while others wait.

"It's too hard to do it," Mitchell says. "I'm a lot quieter with people I don't know that well."

Another problem facing the couple is that they no longer have medical insurance. They say they were dropped after missing a recent payment.

Cynthia Mitchell estimated they will have racked up about $100,000 in bills by the time he has the biopsy. Neither a fund-raiser nor 카지노사이트 - https://engines.aussiebabyboomers.com.au/ an account set up at a local bank has brought in much relief.

Despite worries over money and health, the Mitchells remain amazingly upbeat.

They have learned to laugh when David Mitchell forgets things, like how to tell the difference between a club and a spade on playing cards (he has to be reminded that spades don't have the "things sticking out").

"We laugh. We have to, or we'd cry," Cynthia Mitchell says.

They were among some 50 performers who had been put on a voluntary quarantine list after an HIV outbreak shook the multi billion-dollar industry, which is mostly based in California's San Fernando Valley

They were among some 50 performers who had been put on a voluntary quarantine list after an HIV outbreak shook the multi billion-dollar industry, which is mostly based in California's San Fernando Valley.

The head of the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation says the organization - http://www.internetbillboards.net/?s=organization is confident the 19 performers are HIV-free. The group tests adult film actors for sexually transmitted diseases.

Several adult performers have tested positive for the virus since an actor 바카라사이트 - http://www.westranchtowncouncil.com/elections/election-bylaws/ apparently acquired it in March while shooting in Brazil. The quarantined actors have refrained from doing sex scenes.

A fifth adult movie performer tested positive for the AIDS virus last week in an outbreak that halted most porn production in the multibillion-dollar industry.

The porn actress had unprotected sex with HIV-positive actor Darren James, officials with the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation said.

A transsexual actor named "Jennifer" was diagnosed HIV-positive on Tuesday. That case was unrelated to the others, the health foundation said, because the actor had last worked in February before the HIV outbreak and her partners did not work with anyone on the quarantine list.

The last HIV scare - https://twitter.com/search?q=HIV%20scare&src=typd in the porn industry was in 1999 and involved only a single case.

The latest outbreak has prompted an investigation by the state's workplace safety agency and calls for state regulation of the largely self-regulating industry.

"We laugh

He's starting to lose his balance and peripheral vision. The 50-year-old has very little short-term memory, and the formerly glib salesman now struggles to remember and pronounce words like "raspberry" in simple conversation. And the headaches are so severe, he doesn't want to get out of bed.

It's because the left side — and only the left side — of his brain is shrinking, and has been for about 10 years.

"Every once in awhile, I realize, 'Gee, I can't do that anymore,"' Mitchell said.

Doctors do not have a clue why this is happening, and say normally suspect causes — like multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer's disease — are not at play here because they would equally shrink both sides of the brain.

But in Mitchell's case, the left side of his brain is 10 percent smaller than the right.

"That's very, very uncommon," Dr. Juan Troncoso, associate professor of pathology and neurology at Baltimore's Johns Hopkins University, said of Mitchell's condition. "There are cases described of degenerative diseases that are dominant on one side of the brain. But then, over 10 years of progression, you'd expect the other side to have some kind of abnormality."

Mitchell is scheduled to have a brain biopsy at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., later this month, a procedure that could be fatal.

Even though there is no guarantee it will uncover the cause of his shrinking brain, both Mitchell and his wife, Cynthia, said he has to try.

"I just don't want to sit there and not do anything," he says.

Mitchell's rare case has been featured at medical symposiums, but still hasn't produced a diagnosis.

He's seen about 15 neurologists, who have performed a battery of tests but found no answers.

"It was puzzling to the physicians," said Dr. Patrice Duvernay, a neurologist for Intermountain Health Care in Salt Lake City who has treated Mitchell.

Duvernay said the left side of his brain will continue to slowly shrink until doctors find a solution.

The shrinkage is only visible by looking at an MRI or 카지노사이트 - http://www.manueldiegoparejaobregon.com/ CT scan, but what's going on inside his skull has taken a big toll on Mitchell's quality of life.

He can watch a movie a hundred times and still not remember how it ends.

His wife can tell him to be ready in a half an hour to visit a friend's house, and within 15 minutes he will have no idea why she's disappointed that he's not dressed.

The condition has completely changed Mitchell's personality. He now sleeps 12-14 hours a day, and said before he never slept more than six.

Sleeping and staying in bed about two days a week, he says, is one of the only ways to escape the constant headaches. A cabinet full of pain medication doesn't help.

Cynthia has seen her husband transform from a runner and hiker to a shy shut-in.

"It's hard, because David used to be such a vibrant extrovert," said Cynthia, who knows when her husband is having a bad day because there is a bulging vein in his forehead.

Mitchell also no longer enjoys socializing, because it frustrates - http://search.about.com/?q=frustrates him to probe for words while others wait.

"It's too hard to do it," Mitchell says. "I'm a lot quieter with people I don't know that well."

Another problem facing the couple is that they no longer have medical insurance. They say they were dropped after missing a recent payment - http://www.healthncure.net/?s=payment .

Cynthia Mitchell estimated they will have racked up about $100,000 in bills by the time he has the biopsy. Neither a fund-raiser nor an account set up at a local bank has brought in much relief.

Despite worries over money and health, the Mitchells remain amazingly upbeat.

They have learned to laugh when David Mitchell forgets things, like how to tell the difference between a club and a spade on playing cards (he has to be reminded that spades don't have the "things sticking out").

"We laugh. We have to, or we'd cry," Cynthia Mitchell says.

law and federal regulations

Peter Wyckoff, executive director of the Minnesota Senior Federation's metropolitan region office, said the lawsuit — which the organization hopes will be awarded class-action status — represents a new phase in the group's efforts to make it easier to import drugs at lower Canadian prices.

"We have three branches of government that can change things," he said. "This is the third."

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis alleges Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals have acted in concert to block the supply of name-brand drugs to Canadian pharmacists that sell to U.S. citizens.

GlaxoSmithKline spokeswoman Nancy Pekarek said the company acted independently of the other companies, in an effort to preserve supplies of its medicines in Canada for 카지노사이트 - https://www.lattanzishoes.it/ that country.

In a statement, Pfizer said its practices comply with U.S. law and federal regulations.

"The simple truth is that the importation of pharmaceutical products into the U.S. from Canada is not only illegal, but also dangerous because it increases the opportunity to introduce counterfeit or unapproved pharmaceutical products into the market," said the statement from spokesman Bryant Haskins.

Representatives for the remaining companies either did not immediately respond to calls for comment or said they could not respond because they had not yet seen the lawsuit.

Merck spokeswoman Anita Larsen declined to comment on the suit, but said Merck "has not announced any plans to restrict or otherwise limit the availability of our medicines in Canada."

It was brought on behalf of the federation, which runs a program that helps its members to import from Canadian pharmacies, as well as three individual members who buy brand name drugs in the U.S. and "all others similarly situated."

"I think they're harmed because they have to pay a higher price here," said attorney Marvin Miller of the Chicago-based firm Miller Faucher - http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/sitesearch.do?querystring=Faucher and Cafferty, which is handling the case.

The lawsuit seeks attorneys' fees, unspecified damages and a stop to the companies' anti-import efforts. It's premised on federal antitrust laws as well as specific state consumer protection laws.

Last month, the federation held a "Pfix Pfizer" campaign that, besides the lawsuit, included congressional action, resolutions at Pfizer's stockholders meeting, and a boycott of Pfizer's over-the-counter products.

Representatives for the remaining companies either did not immediately respond to calls for comment or said they could not respond because they had not yet seen the lawsuit

Peter Wyckoff, executive director of the Minnesota Senior Federation's metropolitan region office, said the lawsuit — which the organization hopes will be awarded class-action status — represents a new phase in the group's efforts to make it easier to import drugs at lower Canadian prices.

"We have three branches of government that can change things," he said. "This is the third."

The lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis alleges Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals have acted in concert to block the supply of name-brand drugs to Canadian pharmacists that sell to U.S. citizens.

GlaxoSmithKline spokeswoman Nancy Pekarek said the company acted independently of the other companies, in an effort to preserve supplies of its medicines in Canada for that country.

In a statement, 카지노사이트 - https://technologyfontdafont.000webhostapp.com/ Pfizer said its practices comply with U.S. law and federal regulations.

"The simple truth is that the importation of pharmaceutical products into the U.S. from Canada is not only illegal, but also dangerous because it increases the opportunity to introduce counterfeit or unapproved pharmaceutical products into the market," said the statement from spokesman Bryant Haskins.

Representatives for the remaining companies either did not immediately respond to calls for comment or said they could not respond because they had not yet seen the lawsuit.

Merck spokeswoman Anita Larsen declined to comment on the suit, but said Merck "has not announced any plans to restrict or otherwise limit the availability of our medicines in Canada."

It was brought on behalf of the federation, which runs a program that helps its members to import from Canadian pharmacies, as well as three individual members who buy brand - http://imageshack.us/photos/buy%20brand name drugs in the U.S. and "all others similarly situated."

"I think they're harmed because they have to pay a higher price here," said attorney Marvin Miller of the Chicago-based firm Miller Faucher and Cafferty, which is handling the case.

The lawsuit seeks attorneys' fees, unspecified damages - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?sel=site&searchPhrase=unspec... and a stop to the companies' anti-import efforts. It's premised on federal antitrust laws as well as specific state consumer protection laws.

Last month, the federation held a "Pfix Pfizer" campaign that, besides the lawsuit, included congressional action, resolutions at Pfizer's stockholders meeting, and a boycott of Pfizer's over-the-counter products.

Stránky

Přihlásit se k odběru RSS - Blog uživatele zoenuttall2481073
Chyba | ZOMA

Chyba

Na stránce došlo k neočekávané chybě. Zkuste to později.

Chybová zpráva

  • Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/users/testzoma/zo.mablog.eu/web/includes/common.inc:2700) ve funkci drupal_send_headers() (řádek: 1217 v souboru /home/users/testzoma/zo.mablog.eu/web/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1142 INSERT command denied to user 'drup170215717344'@'surikata.stable.cz' for table 'watchdog': INSERT INTO {watchdog} (uid, type, message, variables, severity, link, location, referer, hostname, timestamp) VALUES (:db_insert_placeholder_0, :db_insert_placeholder_1, :db_insert_placeholder_2, :db_insert_placeholder_3, :db_insert_placeholder_4, :db_insert_placeholder_5, :db_insert_placeholder_6, :db_insert_placeholder_7, :db_insert_placeholder_8, :db_insert_placeholder_9); Array ( [:db_insert_placeholder_0] => 0 [:db_insert_placeholder_1] => cron [:db_insert_placeholder_2] => Attempting to re-run cron while it is already running. [:db_insert_placeholder_3] => a:0:{} [:db_insert_placeholder_4] => 4 [:db_insert_placeholder_5] => [:db_insert_placeholder_6] => http://zo.mablog.eu/blog/1174 [:db_insert_placeholder_7] => [:db_insert_placeholder_8] => 18.188.119.67 [:db_insert_placeholder_9] => 1732180105 ) ve funkci dblog_watchdog() (řádek: 160 v souboru /home/users/testzoma/zo.mablog.eu/web/modules/dblog/dblog.module).